Full Results:
Fin Competitor Plc Pts Fish Pts
1 Randy Hanner 4 38,260
2 Anthony Naranja 4 27,540
3 Kurt Finlayson 7 20,760
4 Josh Stephens 9 22,200
5 Chris Lee 9 17,320
6 Bill Strickland 11 13,640
7 Corey Roberts 14 19,160
8 Bryan Katzenmair14 12,260
9 Paul Bourcq 14 11,840
10 Kevin Lowe 15 15,360
11 Justin Lyons 15 14,540
12 Michael Yelton 15 14,080
13 Chris Smith 15 9,920
14 Seth Gerring 17 9,320
15 Hunter Hoffler 17 6,540
16 Paul Colcord 18 11,600
17 David Woody 18 10,820
18 Mac Brown 18 7,480
19 Anita Coulter 18 7,440
20 Leonard Sauers 18 6,040
21 Jason Baker 19 8,820
22 Andrew Brown 19 5,020
23 Dell Neighbors 20 8,500
24 Eugene Shuler 21 7,520
25 Bob Lux 25 2,380
26 Tucker Horne 26 1,760
27 Jason Buffkin 27 1,800
28 Derek Geldhauser27 1,780

Derek Geldhauser has been nominated as representative to the TroutLegend Coop Board of Advisors. We look forward to working with him and all the team DeadDrift members closely to continue this great path toward building a strong, well grounded culture of competitive fly fishing in North America.

Look for details on the team members, websites, tryouts, hosted competitions, and much more in the forum: HERE

Welcome to the coop!

Cheers,
TroutLegend Coop

The TroutLegend Coop has sanctioned the the Teva Mountain Game’s Costa 2 Fly X-Stream for the current ranking cycle. This high publicity, rigorous event is a mainstay for many high level competitive fly fisherman from around the country.

Photo: Vladi Trzebunia & Lance Egan in Finland.

Hamann: So many questions so little time. Let’s jump right in: The first half of your career you engaged in many casting competitions. With the benefit of hindsight do you feel these prepared you for fips-mouche competitive fly fishing? Now that there are a few more fips events on the annual map what would you tell new competitors regarding casting vs fishing events?

Egan: Casting comps gave me a lot of confidence and helped me learn to calm my nerves. I’m not sure they prepared me for fishing comps, but they certainly made me more efficient. By casting accurately to likely water I can minimize the amount of time my flies are in poor water and maximize their time in productive water. Also, distance can play a big part on lakes or in windy conditions. During the final session in Finland I shared a boat with Yann Caleri, a highly skilled Frenchman. We fished hard, each challenging the other to out think, out work, and out fish the competition. I believe one of the factors that helped me beat Yann on the lake is my casting ability.
I would tell newcomers to competition fishing or casting to practice hard and enjoy! Both events are great fun and are very challenging.

Hamann: You’ve been to four World Championships with four very different angling topographies: Portugal, Finland, New Zealand, and Scotland. Tell us a little about how these different squads prepared for those competitions and some of the hurdles, setbacks, and keys to success you encountered?

In Portugal we had very little intel, and our practice sessions were producing no results. This was my first WFFC and I was as dedicated as ever to give it my all. After “practicing” on fishless waters for a week I was very disheartened. I remember George Daniel and I tying flies with Vladi in our hotel room the night before opening day. We were conversing about what patterns to fish. Since we hadn’t caught any measurable Trout as a team during river practice we were convinced it would be best to fish patterns in which WE have confidence. This “confidence fly factor” helped me win a WFFC session in my first worlds! Portugal ended up well with Team USA finishing in the top ten, and George and I qualified for the Finland team by finishing in the top 25. Luckily the comp water was much better than the practice water. By staying the course and fishing with confidence Team USA was able to scratch out a respectable finish.

In Finland we had a bit more intel, but we were fishing for Grayling, which most of the team hadn’t caught before, or those that had were mostly taken in high altitude alpine lakes. We had an extra 5 days or so of pre-fish time as well as 3 local guides, all of which are accomplished WFFC comp anglers. Fishing for Grayling on the Simo was very tough. Confidence was not terribly high, but we did feel like we were learning quickly and figuring out some tricks that might help come comp time. As the comp rolled on it was another “don’t blank” kind of event. If you landed a fish in each beat you placed very well. When all was said and done Team USA had posted its highest finish yet at the world level (6th) and I was lucky enough to be top rod for the USA which was a measly 27th individually.

New Zealand was different. First, it was NEW ZEALAND! The WFFC were to be held at a real fly fishing destination. Second, we were able to go over early and pre-fish the comp water before it closed to competitors. This helped me wrap my mind around each of the venues, and solidified the techniques and patterns necessary to maximize my catch. Team USA was quite confident going into the NZ worlds. We were out to better our top Team finish and really gel as a team. Although we fished hard and worked exceptionally well together we took a step back in our Team finish. Coming in at 8th place we were consistent on the rivers but the lakes proved to be difficult overall. During one of the lake sessions I shared a boat with Andrew Dixon of England. The English are well known for their lake prowess, and Dixon had me down two to nothing nearly halfway through the session. This lake was not producing many fish, so just landing A fish would help your score immensely. I started to realize I’d better turn it on and didn’t let myself get down. I rallied back and beat Dixon late in the session. Never give up on a session or a comp, things can change in a hurry and it only takes a few seconds to do so. NZ was an awesome experience and I feel lucky to have had the opportunity to participate.

Scotland was incredibly different, four lakes and one river session. Most WFFC’s have more rivers than lakes so this venue forced Team USA to find the best competitive lake anglers in the country. Anyone vying for a spot on the Scotland Team really had to concentrate on stillwater. The one river we did fish was known for Salmon, but not for Trout or Grayling. We learned this was for good reason. Trout and Grayling fishing on the River Tay is very difficult since there are low numbers of fish and it is a large river, so much of your beat was often inaccessible. Also adding difficulty was the fact that all the lake venues were closed for official and unofficial practice. This gave the home court advantage to the Scot’s and neighboring countries who had fished the famous Scottish Lochs previously. Team USA worked with our local guide on non-comp loch’s to learn the ways of native Scottish brown Trout and stocked, but not small rainbows and Blue Trout. Going into the sessions relatively blind is never fun, but it forces you to fish confidence patterns and concentrate on the things you do know. The 2009 WFFC was very difficult, and was another “don’t blank” event. I even won a session on Loch Awe (nicknamed Loch Awful) with only two small Trout. Team USA earned another top ten finish landing in 8th place. Not where we want to be, but relatively consistent nonetheless.

Photo: Lance with a November Utah Brown Trout.

Hamann: Now, I know this is a tough question so apologies before hand. With all the preparation, great expectations, and weight associated with representing your country at the largest angling stage in the world; what was your experience falling short of the medals each time? I ask this not to put you on the firing line, but because each angler goes through a similar roller coaster whether it’s a weekend mini-comp or the world championships. What emotions were you feeling? Regret? How did you regroup as a team and within your own competitive mindset?

Egan: I’m a pretty low stress guy, so I haven’t ever felt any weight placed on me to do anymore than I expect of myself. As far as falling short of the medals, since fishing with and learning about Team USA I have confidence that we have sent top notch comp anglers to each WFFC that were fishing to the best of their abilities. Each Team I’ve been a part of has worked together to achieve the best result possible. That said, we have come up short of the medals but we have improved. In my opinion the general American angling public grossly underestimates the talent and commitment of the winning teams in the WFFC. As Americans we assume we are best at most things and many sports we are. So far, fly fishing isn’t one of them. Keep in mind competition angling is still quite new to our country and very new to fly fishing in America. In most of Europe competition fly fishing is what drives their fly fishing market. In America the opposite is true. Most American fly fishers don’t know the WFFC’s exist, or that we field a team to participate. As a WFFC competitor I always keep my sights set on medals, and prepare to fish my tail off and work with Team USA to maximize our results. At the end of each WFFC I’m usually totally exhausted and I like to regroup by thinking of ways I could improve rather than dwelling on what didn’t go as planned. Each WFFC has been a very positive experience for me and I hope to participate in more events in the future so long as I’m still competitive!

Hamann: Congratulations on the new addition to your family. How has the birth of your son changed your outlook on fishing/life?

Egan: Thank you. Mikey is an awesome addition to our family. He is a ton of fun. Autumn and I look forward to many days on the water with him. When the weather permits we have taken Mikey onstream with us. I carry him around in a “baby bjorn” front pack that lets him take in all the action. He is totally enamored with the outdoors and shows some curiosity for the fish! Mikey hasn’t changed my outlook on fishing much, at least not yet. I think when he is big enough to wade a stream my fishing will change. If he is interested in fishing I’ll likely spend as much time as he can stand helping him understand the intricacies of his fathers’ addiction.

Hamann: In a recent interview current Leader Board Top Rod holder Devin Olsen credited you with being one of the people who sculpted his way into competitive fly fishing. It’s truly a unique scenario when you find yourself at the highest level of a sport alongside those you’ve tutored. Can you speak to your techniques for guiding top level anglers? Please know, this answer can’t be too long.

Egan: Devin is a great friend and fishing partner, he is also a very talented angler and deserves to be considered one of the top competition fly fishers in our country.

I’ve been blessed with some great friendships that have developed because of comp angling. Sharing info or bouncing ideas off of another trusted comp angler can be very productive. I have several Team medals from various North American competitions cluttering my fishing room because of this sharing of knowledge and teamwork.

I do a little guiding now and then and really get a kick out of helping someone who is honestly interested in learning more about ways to improve their fly fishing. It doesn’t get much better than seeing someone’s fishing skills dramatically improve in a few hours. The elation and excitement they show can be overwhelming. Because each angler is different it is very difficult to speak to specific techniques to improve one’s fly fishing but….Warning, shameless plug ahead: I can be hired to teach competition techniques. Please email me at lancefish@hotmail.com with questions.

Hamann: Who are some of the greatest tutors that have shaped your game? Tell us about a few of your big learning experiences near and far?

Egan: I’ve been cursed or blessed, depending on how you look at it. I don’t come from a fishing family so I really never had anyone to tutor me. I was introduced to fly fishing by a neighbor who was kind enough to take me fishing, lend me some gear and say “see ya’ at dark”. Needless to say I had very little success early in my fly fishing career. On the bright side I learned the hard way what didn’t work. This helped me eliminate bad water and poor techniques. I mostly found success by fishing often enough to retain the knowledge gained after each outing. As any angler will tell you, time on the water is priceless.

I’ve worked in fly shops since high school and have definitely benefitted from many knowledgeable work associates starting with Dave Curneal and Andrew Benson of Willow Creek Outfitters. They gave me my first opportunity to work in the fly fishing industry and encouraged me to expand my fly tying abilities. Talking fish all day at work lets me constantly ponder the workings of our finned friends. Much info can be gathered from other peoples’ experience on the water.

I left Willow Creek to work for Fish Tech Outfitters. Mickey Anderson, Byron Gunderson, Bryan Jarvis, Jim Gunderson and the gang at Fish Tech taught me a lot about fishing in general but their expertise in stillwater fishing is what I remember learning most. My fly tying skills also improved at Fish Tech because I was surrounded by amazing tyers and I had the opportunity to tie most of the custom order flies. Building “the only one that works” for hundreds of anglers allowed me to learn new patterns and tying techniques that I otherwise wouldn’t have tried.

Currently I work for Cabelas in Lehi, Utah. At Cabelas I’ve been able to work and fish with other anglers who share my competitive fly fishing gene. Ryan Barnes, Devin Olsen, Tanner Tenbrink and others have helped me keep my fishing mind and abilities sharp. We stay quite busy at Cabelas and this allows me to talk to a lot of anglers about gear, rigging, techniques etc… as well as gather precious fishing reports which in turn help me to better understand our fisheries.

Photo: Egan testing his Sage Z-Axis 697-4 on a Scottish Loch Rainbow.

Hamann: Working in a Cabelas I’m sure you can’t help but be a gear junkie in some form or another. What are some of the new pieces of gear you would highly recommend to other competitors – anything from hooks to boats.

Egan: I am definitely a gear junkie. My current favorites include:
Sage Z-Axis series rods. For moving water the 4100-4 is my fav. The 390-4, 496-4 and 5100-4 are also quite nice depending on the characteristics of the waterway I’m facing. For those looking for river sticks at a lower price check out the Cabelas CZN in the 10 foot 4 or 9 ½ foot 3 weight. They aren’t the same performers as the Z-Axis, but they are a third of the price. For lakes I favor the 697-4 Z-Axis.

Reel wise I’m a fan of products that will last. Reels I can count on in competition. Ross Reels and Lamson Reels are my current favorites. My fav’s are the Evolution LT and Litespeed.

My river floating fly lines are all Scientific Anglers Sharkskin in the Ultimate Trout Taper. I prefer the blue heron color. The Sharkskin has its critics, but I’m not one of them. Keep the good stuff coming SA! Sinking lines I’m not a one brand man. I really like the SA Uniform Sink Plus series as well as their professional series or “wet cell”. These two series of lines fish quite different and I find it beneficial to have both spooled up in various sink rates. I’m also using Airflo sixth sense lines in some sink rates. These lines definitely offer better contact than other brands but I have more trouble keeping them from tangling than other brands. The jury is still out on this one… The Cortland Clear Camo and Rio midge tip and deep 7 round out my lake line selection.

Waders and boots are easy. Simms. Any Gore-tex wader Simms makes will treat you well. My current set is the G3 guide model. The Rivershed boot is awesome. I have them in the old aquastealth and the newer vibram sole. Both are nice, but I wish Simms still made it in aquastealth with the FIXED carbide tipped studs rather than the screw in option. They just aren’t the same…

I’m still fishing in an old William Joseph Gear Bag Chest. Think of the predecessor to the confluence. It still works great and I’m incredibly used to where everything is located. I hear the confluence will be available with the magnet closures on the front pack for 2011. This could mean it is time for a new pack.

Smith polarized sunglasses make it easier to see the fish and the structure that holds fish. The styles that fit my fat head best are the Maverick and Riverside. I like the copper lens best for all light conditions.

I’d like to own an aluminum boat and a drift boat, but currently my budget doesn’t allow for either so I practice most of my lake fishing out of an Outcast PAC 9000 pontoon boat. With the electric trolling motor rigged up it is a great craft to explore lakes. Take the motor off and I use it to float some of the larger rivers around my area.

Photo: Lance and his son Mikey fishing Utah Creek.

Hamann: How do you feel your home waters of Utah have shaped you as a competitive angler? How do you choose your practice destinations whether they be on lake or river and how do you attack those sessions?

Egan: My home waters are quite diverse. In Utah we have lots of smallish streams with few large rivers. Needless to say, I’ve spent far more time wading rivers than floating in a drift boat. Since most river competition sessions are spent wading I believe this has benefitted my comp angling. Covering miles of river from a boat is very enjoyable but doesn’t offer the same level of learning that slowly covering water while wading allows.

I spend more days per year on Utah’s Provo River than any other fishery. The Provo is remarkable in that it is literally minutes away from millions of people, yet it still has an overabundance of trout and offers great fishing. Because it is close to so many people it gets a lot of pressure. Pressured fish become difficult to catch and require better presentations to fool large numbers of Trout. I believe the toughness and technicality of the Provo have made me a better angler.

When choosing practice destinations I consider the techniques I’d like to concentrate on and head to places that offer me the best option for the given technique or conditions I’m after. Generally I just go and fish. Trying to learn new water types or find new effective flies. If I’m really trying to mimic a comp I’ll create a beat and work to maximize my catch within its boundaries. Most of the time I just fish…

Hamann: If you were stranded on a deserted Island in the middle of the Ocean what one album would you bring; Bob Marley’s “Legend” ? Just kidding, but you guessed it – here comes the standard fly question. What 12 trusted flies would you take into battle? 6 for rivers, 6 for lakes? A little background or detail on lesser known patterns is always appreciated.

Egan: Tough one….. Probably The Doors, Soft Parade or L.A. Woman, but the Beastie Boys, Paul’s Boutique would be up there along with any Zeppelin album.

For rivers: Iron Lotus, Frenchie, Tungsten Surveyor, Rainbow Warrior, Corn Fed Caddis, Parachute Adams, and Rubber Leg Wooly Bugger. Oops that was 7. Why not make it 10, Stimulator, Prince Nymph and Rubber Leg Stone. The first 5 are patterns of mine that Umpqua sells. The Iron Lotus, Frenchie and Tungsten Surveyor feature tungsten beads and weighted bodies right from Umpqua. The Rainbow Warrior is available in a glass bead, tungsten bead or tungsten bead with leaded body. The Corn Fed Caddis is a high floating CDC pattern great for fooling selective trout or to hold up a dropper.

For lakes: Black Mini Leech, Red Krystal Killer, Black Wooly Bugger, Black/red Chronomid, Damselfly Nymph and a Soft Hackle Hares Ear/callibaetis nymph. If we go to 10… Blob, Seal Bugger, Olive/gray Scud and Egg Sucking Leech.

Photo: Lance with a breathtaking New Zealand Stillwater Rainbow.

Hamann: Speaking of flies. As an accomplished fly designer for Umpqua Feather Merchants do you spend a lot of time these days developing new patterns for competition or have you settled on a few trusted ones? In the scope of effort and technique how much weight do you give to the “fly” as factor for winning competitions?

Egan: On a scale of 1 – 10, 10 being totally the reason for winning and 1 being no factor at all I’d give the fly a 4. Proper technique and approach far outweigh the fly.

I still spend a lot of time tinkering with fly patterns. I think it is fun to see what kind of conglomerations will take fish. In a competition I tend toward my “go to” patterns unless I stumble upon a silver bullet during practice.

Hamann: And not to get too pun oriented, but how much weight do you give to the notion that as an angler’s skill increases they start fishing progressively lighter and lighter nymphs in more situations?

Egan: I’ve noticed a natural progression toward lighter flies as anglers become more comfortable with Euro-style tactics. That said, some still fish heavy flies with great success. I believe it comes down to each individual and their confidence technique or patterns

Photo: Lance working a beat on the Whanganui at the New Zealand 2008 World Fly Fishing Championships.

Hamann: We know you’re all ready a big fan of TroutLegend.com, but what are a few other sources that have helped you refine your technique and knowledge over the years such as Books, Videos, or Internet Sites?

Egan: Books: Presentation by Gary Borger, Czech nymph by Karel Krivanec, Fly Fishing and Fly Tying II by Jaromir Karafiat and Miroslav Machacek. DVD: A Japanese film of the 2004 WFFC in Slovakia.

Hamann: How much time do you spend practicing Loch Style vs River fishing? Do you have any advice for North American anglers hoping to keep up with European competitors in this arena?

Egan: I tend to fish lakes spring and fall and rivers summer and winter. I mix it up a bit all year though. Roughly 60% river and 40% lake. The top fly anglers in the world are good at it all. If you are working toward competing in the WFFC’s make sure you are a well rounded angler.

Hamann: Are you a proponent of the “1 rod/leader to do everything” setup or do you prefer to string several rods more precisely tuned to specific disciplines on river beats?

Egan: I tend to use one rod/leader for most techniques. If I set up additional rods one will often be a duplicate of the first, the other a streamer rod.

Photo: Lance with a New Zealand Rainbow.  (Credit George Daniel)

Hamann: Are you one of those devout competitors who fishes nothing but fips-mouche style all the time? What kind of fishing do you like to do just for fun?

Egan: When fly fishing I fish nothing but Fips rules. ( I do a bit of ice fishing and some bass fishing with conventional gear) When I first learned the Fips rules I thought they were very strange and quite limiting. Now I realize that is a common reaction, after all, most Americans didn’t learn to fish utilizing Fips styles and new stuff scares us. Rules I once thought were limiting have now helped me become a much better and more efficient angler. Now I understand the disadvantages many conventional American techniques create.

I like all kinds of fishing, so I consider all of it fun. If I had to pick one type of fishing to do the rest of my life it would be picking apart pocket water on a medium sized stream utilizing a dry/dropper rig.

Hamann: What drives you? I mean, at the root, why do you want to stay on Fly Fishing Team USA and compete on the International stage?

Egan: I’m competitive by nature, and I love to fish. I’ve always been searching for ways to improve my fishing and learn more about the fish in an effort to maximize my catch. I fish to catch fish, not just to go, although I do enjoy just getting out…

I want to stay on Fly Fishing Team USA because I’d like to be a part of the Team that breaks through and Medals at the World Championships. I’d like to help put Americans on the International Fly Fishing map. Just in my WFFC experiences I’ve seen the European’s outlook on us as anglers change. It wasn’t very long ago that the competitors from other countries didn’t worry at all about Americans. We’d get on the bus after a session and no one would ask how many fish we caught because they were sure they out fished us. Now, many competitors will ask us before some of the perennial greats because they have taken notice that we are improving. We aren’t winning yet, but we are getting better. I’d like to be there when we have our first moment of World Fly Fishing triumph!

Hamann: Thank you kindly for the interview. In closing I’d like to ask you a bit of a different question. Since you’ve seen it from many sides what is your take on the evolution and growth of competitive fly fishing in North America over the last decade? How do you see it evolving over the next 10 years? How would you like to see it evolve over the next 10 years?

Egan: Competitive Fly Fishing has come a long way in North America. 10 years ago there were no Team USA trials or nationals. Now we have comps to whittle down to the finest we have to offer. As more get involved the level of competition will improve. I’m amazed at how many Americans are still anti-competition. I understand most anglers don’t want fly fishing to turn into a big money, big advertising campaign. It won’t, simply because the fly fishing industry can’t and won’t support it. The great thing about the WFFC’s is the lack of winnings and the focus on conservation.

Fly fishing competition is not for everyone. Those who enjoy it will pioneer techniques and tackle thus improving the experience for all involved. Just like ski racing isn’t for everyone, but it has helped advance ski technology creating better products benefitting the recreational skier. I hope as American’s we begin to realize fly fishing competition isn’t harmful – that we can take advantage of the innovation, and learning opportunities it presents.

Photo: Egan accepting Gold at the Teva Mountain Games.

Lance Egan’s Track Record:
-International Sportsmans Expositions distance fly casting events:
2001 Salt Lake city, UT ISE 1st place
2001 Best of the West, 2nd place
2002 Phoenix, AZ ISE 2nd place
2002 Salt Lake City, UT ISE 1st place
2002 Best of the West, 2nd place
2003 Pomona, CA ISE 2nd place
2003 Pleasanton, CA ISE 1st place
2003 Best of the West, 4th place
2004 Pomona, CA ISE 3rd place
2004 Pleasanton, CA ISE 2nd place
-2003 ESPN Fly Fishing Challenge
2nd place
-2003 ESPN Great Outdoor Games Fly Fishing Event
1st place – Gold medalist
-2004 ESPN Great Outdoor Games Fly Fishing Event
1st place – Gold medalist
-2004 OLN Fly Fishing Masters, West
2nd place
-2005 Teva Mountain Games
Fly Fishing 1st place – Gold medalist
-2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
Fly Fishing Team U.S.A. Member
-2006 National Fly Fishing Championship Qualifiers
Fresno, CA 1st place – Gold medalist
Heber City, UT 2nd place – Silver medalist
-2006 National Fly Fishing Championships Boulder, Colorado
Gold medal team
-2006 High Mountain Masters Aspen, Colorado
3rd place team
-2006 World Fly Fishing Championships, Portugal
8th Team, 24th Individually
-2007 VERSUS Fly Fishing Masters
First place team
-2007 National Fly Fishing Championships Boulder, Colorado
Silver medal team
-2007 World Fly Fishing Championships, Finland
27th Individually, Lead Team USA to highest finish ever – 6th
-2008 World Fly Fishing Championships, New Zealand
8th Team, 24th Individually
-2008 Canadian National Championships, Mont Tremblant
Gold Medal Team (Team USA)
-2009 National Fly Fishing Championships Qualifiers
Bend, Oregon 1st place – Gold Medalist
Bozeman, Montana 2nd place — Silver Medalist
-2009 World Fly Fishing Championships, Scotland
8th Team, 35th Individually
-2009 National Fly Fishing Championships State College, PA
Gold Medal Team, Silver Medalist Individually
-2010 America Cup Frisco, Colorado
Gold Medal Team (Team USA), Silver Medalist Individually
-2010 Utah Single Fly Green River, Utah
Most Trout individually (43 Trout), First Place Team (Cabelas)

Interview with Terence Courtoreille by Dejon Hamann

Hamann: You’ve competed in every single Canadian National Championship since they began in 2003. Let’s go back a little further though to when you made the switch to “comp” style fishing. What was the impetus? Were there some influential sources for you in those first years?

Courtoreille: The ‘switch’ really wasn’t much more than a group of anglers from the Northwest Territories wanting to attend the 2003 Nationals as a fishing trip. At that time, we knew nothing about competition fishing however we were eager to see what it was all about. Our original team back then was organized by Mac Stark, who is a NWT resident and veteran with Fly Fishing Canada. Under Mac’s tutelage, surprisingly enough, we finished second, earning a silver medal. Individually, we had two members medal and I recall finishing 10th. Needless to say, we were immediately hooked. I continue to fish with one of those original teammates today (John Nishi) and Mac continues to be a very good angling friend and mentor to me.

Hamann: Now a decade later and five world championships under your belt how do you continue to evolve your game? What are some of the sources that help you keep your edge and improving your technique?

Courtoreille: Firstly, I try to practice as much as I possibly can. Given where I live this isn’t as often as I like, so I use every opportunity to practice competition techniques. Secondly, I’m not afraid to ask questions. Over the years, I have befriended a number of teammates, fellow competitors and ex-competitors who are always willing to exchange information. Within Fly Fishing Canada, I look to individuals such as Randy Taylor, John Beaven and Donald Thom for guidance and advice. The transfer of information is simple. When these guys are talking, I shut up and listen.

Hamann: Every country organizes its world team a bit different. Could you tell us a little about how some of the teams you’ve been on have prepared for World play and approached the Fips Championships?

Courtoreille: The Canadian approach in preparing for a World Championship really hasn’t changed since I’ve been a member. We usually try to arrive 10 days prior to the official practice. As with other teams, we will use this time to sort out our flies and techniques so that when the official practices comes, we’re all fishing confidently with a plan. At the end of our unofficial practice, every venue will have a specific fly box equipped with the flies only to be used for that venue. Our goal with this approach is to discourage teammates from prospecting with new flies during the competition sessions. Remember this is a timed event. The last thing we want is a competitor scratching his head, while staring at his fly box trying to figure out what to use.

I usually organize this box into 3 row combinations of casts (top, middle, point). This allows me to change flies and fly combinations quickly without thinking about what to use. All of this is thought out in advance so that when the competition comes all you have to do is execute. Sounds easy eh?
Interestingly enough, Canada’s top placings at the Worlds were in 2008 in New Zealand and 2009 in Scotland. At both events, we had a contingency travel to the competition venues one year in advance for reconnaissance. I truly believe this is another piece to being successful on the World stage. However in Canada’s case, all travel is self financed by the team members, so this isn’t possible every year.

Hamann: What about at the National level? Canada uses an interesting system for organizing its team members.

Courtoreille: Originally, I believe the intentions were to have provincial representation at our National Championships. However, we haven’t quite evolved to that point yet. As a result, our National events are open and anglers are free to organize themselves into teams. My teammates are all past National members who are from all over Canada and we approach the National events very similar to that of an international event…we try to arrive early, work as team to sort out our flies and techniques and stick to the game plan.

Hamann: What difficulties have you experienced in your career living in the Northwest Territories? Are you attacked by Polar Bears often while fishing? Do you guys have an endless supply of seals fur? Just kidding of course. Seriously though, that’s quite a remote area. Other anglers stranded by “geography” might be able to draw from your experience.

Courtoreille: Fortunately, we don’t have polar bears or seals to contend with, but geography is definitely a challenge. We do have a few options to fish grayling where I live, but nothing for trout. I have a 4 ½ hour drive to the nearest trout lake and approximately 11 hours to the nearest trout stream. This by far is my biggest challenge as it limits my time on the water. In dealing with this, every session I get on the water, whether recreational or not is FIPS Mouche compliant. This ensures I get as much practice as possible given my geographical limitations.

Hamann: All right. Let’s do the obligatory: what 12 trusted flies would you take into battle? 6 for rivers, 6 for lakes? Little background or detail on lesser known patterns is always appreciated but not required.

Courtoreille: Admittedly my list of favorite competition patterns has been influenced by fellow competitors over the years. Let’s face it, the Czech’s and French are better at fishing rivers and the English are better at fishing lakes than we are. So it makes sense to not only copy their techniques but also their patterns. So here’s my list as it stands this month.
For Rivers, don’t leave home without variations of a Pheasant Tail Nymph, Hares Ear Nymph, Czech Nymph and Pheasant Tail Nymph (hint, hint); my ‘go to’ dry is a standard Elk Hair Caddis and the March Brown soft hackle is my preferred wet. For Lakes, the Booby and Blob are an absolute. I wouldn’t step into a boat without these two patterns in my box. The Cormorant, Cruncher and Snatcher cover off the ‘small’ stuff and are always somewhere on my cast. Finally, make sure you always have a black Wolly Bugger in the quiver.
In general, I always tie a hot spot and use UV wherever I can and don’t forget to downsize your patterns as much as possible.

Hamann: Speaking of loch style. You’ve medaled gold at both an all river national and an all lake national. What are some of your keys to being successful at the loch game? Are you a man of many lines? Local intel? Just straight practice time on the water? I know it’s a vast subject, but maybe you could elucidate a few facets of your technique or philosophy for us?

Courtoreille: I’ve always considered myself to be stronger on rivers than lakes. So the success I had last summer was a pleasant surprise. In evaluating this it’s important to remember that competitive fly fishing is a team sport. 5 anglers working together will always out perform the individual. As such, I listen and contribute to our team discussions as much as possible and I never waiver from the team strategy. I think this above all was the key to success last summer. I had one other teammate medal at this competition (Todd Oishi) and believe 2 others finished within or close to the top ten, so being well organized and sharing information as a team has paid off.

Hamann: Let’s be honest. Most fly fisher-people are serious gear junkies – especially “comp” fly fisher-people. What are some of the pieces of gear you just couldn’t do without in the last few years? Anything from a hook to a boat is game.

Courtoreille: Funny you mention hooks. I think this is one area that anglers often over look or take for granted. If there’s one piece of equipment to not cheap out on, it’s hooks. After all, it’s the only point of contact you have with the fish. I’m not necessarily brand loyal, but I am model loyal. I am constantly migrating to the TMC 2499, Hanak 260 BL and of course the B175…it’s an oldie but a goodie.
Everyone has their preferences for rods, reels and lines and all will vary according to the conditions so I won’t go into that. I will say however, the one area that has changed significantly over the last 7 years since I’ve been competing is tying materials. Not to criticize our North American manufacturers, but the dyed colours and types of materials that we’re getting from across the pond are truly cutting edge.

Hamann: Why do you do this? This sport can be so taxing emotionally not to mention the great draw on personal funds with travel and gear. Especially for Canadian anglers who must fund their own way to every World Championship with an average cost of seven grand a piece. At the root, what drives you to be a perennial part of Fly Fishing Team Canada and compete on the International stage?

Courtoreille: Fly fishing is an easy sport to engage, but I find competitive fly fishing purely addictive. Perhaps this is due to my personality. I am competitive by nature and love to be challenged. If I wasn’t fishing, I’d probably be competing in some other sport/hobby so it’s a matter of prioritizing. For now, this is what I enjoy doing and probably will continue to do so as long as I can contribute to the team.

Hamann: Thank you for the interview. Do you have any closing thoughts for new comers to the sport or those that might be considering giving competitive fly fishing a try?

Courtoreille: My first tip to anybody considering a competition is to read the rules. I don’t mean this from an enforcement point of view, but rather to change people’s fishing mentality. As an example, North American anglers are infamous for trying to catch the ‘big one’. However in competition, a lot of little fish produces more points. In reading the rules, think outside your ‘fishing box’ and make the rules work to your advantage.

Finally, fly fishing is one of those sports that appeals to so many people. If competition fly fishing is something that vaguely tweaks your interest, I’d highly recommend it. The networking and learning opportunities are staggering. If you’re still on the fence, volunteering at a competition is another way to get involved and learn more about the sport.

Courtoreille’s Track Record:
-Competitor at every Canada National Fly Fishing Championship since the events inaugural year in 2003. During that 8 year period he won 5 team medals (2 gold, 1 silver, 2 bronze) and 2 individual medals (both gold) and have finished in the top 10 five of the eight years. The first individual gold was in 2006, Grand River Ontario and the 2nd gold was (2010) in Roblin Manitoba.
-9th Place Finish US National Championship 2007, Boulder Colorado.
-6 time Canadian National team member attending one Commonwealth Championship and 5 World Championships.

In its inaugural year, the Winter Stonefly Classic drew top competitive anglers from across the states of Georgia, Tennesee, South Carolina, and North Carolina. Competitors tested their skills in four rounds of fishing on the notoriously difficult Davidson River, with adverse weather conditions adding to the challenge. FIPS Mouche International Rules were in effect.

1. Chris Smith – Team Stonefly
2. Josh McFadden – Team NC
3. Chris Lee – Team NC
4. Josh Stephens – Team USA
5. Michael Yelton – Team Stonefly
6. Michael Sprouse – Team Stonefly
7. Jason Buffkin – Team Stonefly
8. Seth Gerring – Team NC
9. David Woody – Team Stonefly
10. Bill Strickland – Independent
11. Tim Fisk – Team NC
12. Andrew Brown – Team NC
13. Dell Neighbors – Team NC

Interview with Devin Olsen by Dejon Hamann

Hamann: Devin, I know it’s cliché’ but let’s start with your age. What did it take to get on Fly Fishing Team USA before the age of 21?

Olsen: To become a team member it takes a lot of experience with the sport of fly fishing itself. It requires a level of talent and skill surrounding the techniques of the sport of fly fishing and also an understanding of the fish you are pursuing. Most importantly, it requires a drive and desire to dedicate your self to getting better at fly fishing and a commitment to spend every bit of available time on the water or at the tying vise. Luckily, my father introduced me to fishing as a young child and by about the 6th grade I was becoming fairly proficient with a fly rod. Throughout my life I’ve always had a competitive nature and desire to be the best at what I pursue so it was perfectly natural for me to combine that competitive nature with the sport I love so much. In 2005 I started working with Ryan Barnes and Lance Egan in the new Cabelas fly shop and the rest is basically history. From them, I learned more about what the team was and how they were personally fishing and I decided I wanted to become a member. So I put my indicators and split shot away and started focusing on getting better at legal competition techniques and things just came together for me from that point.

Hamann: Most people don’t understand the physical requirements of competitive fly fishing. Do you prepare for competition in this respect? Do you believe your age may be a great asset? Looking ahead, do you think the sport may eventually be dominated by the 20 something demographic?

Olsen: Fly fishing may not be the most physical sport around but there are definitely benefits to being fit. When it comes to competition, any edge you can get makes a vital difference. If you can add a few seconds of fishing time by sprinting up and down your beat or by having stamina throughout your session than you are bettering your chances of success. Competitions are exhausting affairs with early morning rises, late night tying sessions, long bus rides, and 6 hours a day of adrenaline pumping fishing sessions. Anybody who thinks that it doesn’t take stamina and mental toughness to stay sharp and motivated through the entire process is kidding themselves. I believe in trying to stay physically fit to begin with so I don’t really change my normal cardio and strength training regimen for competition. When it comes time for competition, I definitely believe the hard hours at the gym beforehand benefit my time on the water. I don’t really think my youth helps me all that much as far as my fishing goes. What has helped me was starting to fish and study fishing at a young age because it has given me a lot of experience that I wouldn’t have otherwise to this point. I also don’t really think that the sport will become dominated by younger guys like myself in the coming years. Most kids these days are focusing on video games, other sports, or the opposite sex in their grade school years so the ones that do become serious about fly fishing often don’t do so until college. At that point it takes most of them a few years to gain enough experience to become successful on the competition stage.

Hamann: I know it’s a big subject, but let’s talk about how you prepare for competition by breaking it down a little. First, do you differentiate between “Everyday Practice” and “Competition Specific Practice”?

Olsen: I do change my practice prior to competitions. Most of my practice until about a month before a competition is just fishing with a specific focus for the day. I usually try and think of something I want to work on and then just implement as I fish that day. I try and spend equitable time on still and moving water when lakes aren’t frozen. If I know in advance where I’ll be fishing in a future competition then I’ll try to start fishing waters that are somewhat similar. Once a competition is about a month away, that’s when I try and pour the heat on. I try and get as much information on the waters I’ll be fishing as I can and then I try to replicate those conditions as much as possible by matching water types and fishing conditions accordingly. This isn’t easy though as no two waters are exactly alike. The major difference though is that I start fishing mock 3 hour sessions where I try to mentally recreate an actual competition session and fishing beat. If can get a fishing partner to help, we’ll set up beats and make a mini competition between ourselves.

Hamann: Now you’re at the venue. What is your practice schedule or approach towards training within the days you have on site?

Olsen: When I’m at the venue I try to take things as easily as possible. In general, my goal is to get confident about the waters I’ll be fishing without expending too much energy that I’ll need later. I survey the competition water and try and find water that is similar for my practice. Then I simply fish and try to develop a sense of the flies and techniques that I believe will work. Once I’m feeling confident that I’ve got flies and a general plan than I try to spend the rest of the time scouting beats, if I know them in time, and forming a detailed game plan for each session. I usually try to write down time allotments for sections of water within a beat so that I can stay calm and confident in what I’m doing throughout the session.

Hamann: What does “attention to detail” mean to you?

Olsen: Paying attention to details for me is one of the most important aspects of competition. Many of the conversations you’ll hear among competition fisherman center on having confidence in what you’re doing. For me, the best way to have that confidence is to make sure that every detail surrounding my fishing approach is covered. I constantly scrutinize every piece of gear in my arsenal and every technique that I’m using. The practice time immediately before a competition is not the time to be trying a bunch new things so I try to tinker with all of the details beforehand. When it comes down to it, one fish can make the difference between success and disappointment so if I can better my chances of hooking and landing that fish through what I’m using and exactly how I’m using it I’m going try and analyze every part of the process to make sure that happens.

Hamann: How do you decide what flies to use in competition?

Olsen: I decide what flies to use just like any other fisherman would decide what flies to use. I survey the water, take some bug samples, and use my basic knowledge of entomology to match any hatches there are. As much as anything though, I try and fish as many flies as possible during practice so that I can experiment and see what works. I also rely a lot on the findings of my teammates to find any other flies that might be important.

Hamann: Do you find that being a guide or working in a fly shop helps your competition game?

Olsen: Any time that you can spend theorizing about techniques or watching others fish is time well spent pertaining to competition. As I mentioned earlier, I’ve been lucky to work with Ryan and Lance in a situation where we can bounce a lot of ideas around that we might not have thought of ourselves. Those ideas can always lead to epiphanies and breakthroughs on the water. As far as guiding goes, it’s basically a teaching job spent on the water. Often the best way to help your self understand something is to teach it to someone else. Being able to put fish in the net for a client with little skill or in tough conditions only helps you understand things further when it’s time to put fish in your own net.

Hamann: What were some of the keys to placing 5th in the 2007 Oceania Games in Tasmania?

Olsen: I think I went about Tasmania just like I would any other competition. The main factor contributing to my success and the team’s bronze medal was the way we worked together as a team. It was awesome to have Scott, Riley, Kurt, and Loren there and we really did our best to solve every situation. We spent a lot of time strategizing and sharing patterns. Most of us got very sick during practice with the stomach flu and if we hadn’t been able to rely on each other for help we certainly wouldn’t have had the success that we did.

Hamann: You’ve competed against some of the best nations in the world. What have you learned from watching teams like the French or Poland?

Olsen: Most of what I’ve learned from them has come from footage I’ve religiously dissected from the 2004 championships in Slovakia. I’ve tried to break that footage down just like a coach scouting an upcoming opposing team and I’ve learned a lot about the techniques and little details that set them apart. I’ve also gleaned a few bits of information from books they’ve written, internet sites that relate to them, and secondhand knowledge from other team members who competed against them.

Hamann: I know it’s cheesy, but if you had to go to the finals with only 6 patterns what would you carry?

Olsen: I can’t break it down to six patterns but I can probably go 6 for rivers and 6 for lakes. Obviously this would defer by season and venue.
For the rivers I’d choose a Frenchie Nymph (a variation on a pheasant tail),a Krystal Flash Hare’s Ear, my Biot-backed stonefly nymph, a basic Czech/Polish Nymph, a Stimulator, and a Parachute Adams. For the lakes I’d have a Black Wooly Bugger/leech, a Chromie Chironomid, my Blue Wonder (soft hackle nymph), a Soft Hackle Pheasant Tail, Damsel Nymph, and a Pregnant Scud.

Hamann: What drives you? I mean, at the root, why do you want to get on Fly Fish Team USA and compete on the International stage?

Olsen: I think every person wants to find something that they excel at because that’s a natural human desire. For me fly fishing is one of those things. Every time I go to a competition I come back wanting more. I love the adrenaline rush each session brings, the comradery of the other competitors, and the feeling of accomplishment when I achieve success. My dream is to stand on the podium at the World Championships for a personal and a team medal. Keeping that vision in mind keeps me driven to fish hard every time I’m on the water.

Olsen’s Track Record:
International Experience
• World Fly Fishing Championships 2010 Poland June 2010, Placed highest among team USA competitors
• World Fly Fishing Championships 2009 Scotland June 2009, Placed 1st and 4th in the two sessions fished
• Oceania Fly Fishing Championship, 5th Place Tasmania, February, 2007 (Team Bronze Medal)
• America Cup International Fly Fishing Tournament 1st Place September 2010 (Individual Gold Medal) (Team Gold Medal)
• America Cup International Fly Fishing Tournament 2nd Place September 2008 (Individual Silver Medal) (Team Gold Medal)
National Experience
• Fly Fishing Team USA National Championships, PA 2009 (Individual 5th place) (Team Bronze Medal)
• Santa Fe Team USA Regional Trial, November 2010 1st Place
• Durango Regional Trial, May 2010 3rd Place
• Bozeman Regional Trial, September 2009 1st Place
• Pagosa Lakes Competition, May, 2008 5th Place
• Salt Lake Competition, July, 2008 1st Place
• Cody Regional Trial, April, 2007 2nd Place

Three new competitions in the Eastern United States have been sanctioned for the Leader Board. First we have a one day mini-comp sponsored by Team Stonefly in North Carolina. Then in the early spring of 2011 we have two Team USA Sanctioned Regionals – the first back down in North Carolina and the first ever North Eastern Regional for Team USA in State College, PA.

(1x) 2010 Winter Stonefly Classic – December 18. Brevard, North Carolina US. For more info: HERE

(3x) 2011 Team USA Southeast Regional – February 19-21. Nantahala River, North Carolina US. For more info: HERE

(3x) 2011 Team USA Northeast Regional – March 12-13. State College, Pennsylvania US. For more info: HERE

http://troutlegend.com/team/